Home Comparisons Skin tracker apps
Every skin tracker app we could actually verify
The short answer
There is no single best one, because these are four different products wearing the same category name: routine timers, photo journals, scan-and-score apps, and product-shelf apps. Pick by what you want the app to do with your time. Everything below was checked against the app's own listing on 2026-08-15, and anything we could not verify says so.
Search for "best skincare tracker app" and nearly every result is a blog run by one of the apps in the list. We are also one of the apps in the list, so treat this page with the same suspicion — the difference we can offer is not neutrality we do not have, but checkable facts and a visible date on every one of them.
Three rules this page follows. Every fact comes from a source the app controls (its App Store listing or its own site), with the date it was read. Anything unverified is printed as "not verified" rather than guessed. And every app gets a paragraph saying what it is better at than we are — written by us, about them.
The table
| App | Input | How often | What it reads | Recommends products | Platform | Price | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkinLately | One selfie a day | Daily | Hydration, texture, calmness, clarity, under-eyes | No | iPhone — not yet released | $2.99/wk or $29.99/yr, 3-day trial | This site |
| Pimpl | Face scan + manual routine log | Daily routine, scan when you like | Acne, oiliness, texture, redness, dark spots, overall score | Not verified | iPhone (Android announced) | $6.99/wk · $12.99/mo · $49.99/yr · $29.99/yr discounted · $99.99 lifetime | App Store listing |
| SKŌR | Face and body scan | Any time; every scan saved | Face: acne, pigmentation, redness, eye bags, pores, firmness. Body: muscle tone, posture, symmetry, composition | No | iPhone (Android announced) | £2.99/wk · £9.99/mo · £39.99/yr (GBP as listed) | joinskor.com |
| Glass | Face scan + routine tracking | Scan-based, credits per scan | Clarity, hydration, evenness, smoothness | Yes | iPhone | $6.99–$12.99/wk · $9.99/mo · $39.99–$59.99/yr · credit packs $4.99–$99.99 | App Store listing |
| Layered | Manual — no camera | Every routine, timed step by step | Nothing — it times your routine, it does not score your skin | No | iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch | $4.99 one-time Pro unlock, no subscription | layered-skincare.app + App Store |
| TroveSkin | Photos + manual logging | Daily journal | Photo comparison and self-reported triggers (mood, diet, stress) | Yes | iPhone and Android | Free to download; in-app purchases not verified | troveskin.com |
| Skinstreak | Face scan + AM/PM routine tracking | Interval scans; "one new thing every two weeks" | Tone evenness, dark spots, redness (by facial region) | Yes | Web — pre-launch, waitlist | "Free, always" for the core habit features | skinstreak.com |
| Umax | Two selfies | Rate, then optional routine tracking | Attractiveness ratings — a different product category | No | iPhone | Weekly $3.99–$9.99 · monthly $9.99–$24.99 · one-off unlocks (multiple price points shown) | App Store listing |
Wording in the "what it reads" column is each app's own — we quote it rather than translate it, because the vocabulary an app chooses is one of the more informative things about it. It is also vocabulary we do not use ourselves.
Which one, for what
| If what you want is… | Look at |
|---|---|
| A timer that walks you through your routine, with no camera at all | Layered — and it is the only one here with serious accessibility work behind it |
| A journal that connects your skin to sleep, stress and diet | TroveSkin, which has been doing this the longest and is on Android |
| A scan that names specific concerns and scores them | Pimpl or SKŌR — both go into more named detail than we do |
| Help choosing what to buy next | Glass or Skinstreak, both of which recommend products; we never will |
| A daily habit where the number only ever compares you to yourself | SkinLately — that is the whole design, and it is not out yet |
| An attractiveness rating | Umax, which is a different category from everything else on this page |
What each one is better at than us
Written by us, about them, and none of it is faint praise dressed up as a compliment.
Pimpl
The most complete routine + water + streak logging of the group, and the analysis covers more named concerns than ours does.
Verified 2026-08-15 from App Store listing (Pimpl: Skin Care & Acne Scan, NGSMedia LLC).
SKŌR
Side-by-side comparison of any two past scans, and habit logging tied to score movement — the closest thing in the group to what we are building.
Verified 2026-08-15 from joinskor.com.
Glass
Four-dimension read closest in spirit to ours, plus a product shelf that makes swapping products easy to track.
Verified 2026-08-15 from App Store listing (Skincare Routine & Tracker, Allyson, Inc.).
Layered
By far the best accessibility work in this list (VoiceOver, Dynamic Type to AX5, Voice Control), a one-time price, and no camera at all if you do not want one.
Verified 2026-08-15 from layered-skincare.app + App Store.
TroveSkin
The longest-running of the group, on both platforms, with trigger journalling (diet, stress, sleep) that none of the scan-first apps do.
Verified 2026-08-15 from troveskin.com.
Skinstreak
The two-week single-variable methodology is genuinely good science-hygiene, the region-by-region redness read is more granular than ours, and they publish their recommendation conflict-of-interest position up front.
Verified 2026-08-15 from skinstreak.com.
Umax
The fastest, most legible first-run experience of anything in this category, and the reason a paid weekly price point works at all for face scanning.
Verified 2026-08-15 from App Store listing (Umax - Become Hot, Improvement Tech, 18+).
Where SkinLately is worse
Since the section above exists, this one has to as well.
- It is not released. Every other app on this page is something you can install today. Ours is not, and that is the single biggest reason to pick one of them.
- No Android, and none planned. TroveSkin has both. Two others say Android is coming.
- It reads fewer things. Five deliberately general dimensions, where Pimpl and SKŌR name six each. If you want a scan that tells you specifically what it is looking at, ours is the less informative one, on purpose.
- It will not tell you what to buy. For a lot of people that is the actual job. We do not do it and are not planning to.
- No product or ingredient logging yet. SKŌR ties habits to score movement; we have the photo half and not the logging half.
- No published accuracy or consistency figures. Neither does anyone else on this list — but we are the ones making noise about measurement, so the absence counts more against us. The study that fixes it is running.
Frequently asked
Is this list ranked?
No, and that is deliberate. "Best" depends on what you want — a timer, a journal, a scanner or a product shelf are four different products, and the table sorts them by what they actually do rather than by a score we invented.
Are any of these paid placements?
No. Nobody paid to be here, nobody was asked, and there are no affiliate links on this page or anywhere on this site. We also do not accept them, because a comparison table funded by the things in it is an advert with a table in it.
Why is SkinLately in its own comparison?
Because leaving it out would be the dishonest version. It is in the table on the same rows as everything else, including the row that says it is not released yet. Every other app on this list has something it does better than us and each one says so in its own words below.
How current is this?
Everything was checked on 2026-08-15 against the source named in the last column — the app's own App Store listing or its own website. Prices in this category change often and several of these apps show different prices to different users, so treat the numbers as "what was published on that date", not as a quote. We re-check quarterly.
Why do some prices have several numbers?
Because the App Store listing shows several. Apps in this category commonly run multiple price points simultaneously — different tests, different regions, different entry paths. Where a listing showed a range, we printed the range instead of picking the flattering end.
What would make you remove an app from this page?
If it stopped existing, or if we could no longer verify anything about it from a source it controls. We will not remove one for being better than us at something — that is the part of a comparison page that has any value.